In a crowded race, most campaigns treat peer-to-peer (P2P) texting like a mini press release: one message, one angle, one list.
Bondar for Congress took a different path. The campaign used mass media for broad positioning, then reserved texting for the most personal content in the mix: the kind of messages that sound like they came from someone you might see at church, on the lake or at a Friday night game.
That “neighbor, not candidate” approach did not happen by accident. It came from disciplined list segmentation, intentional content choices and a clear decision about what texting should do that billboards and streaming ads cannot.
Paul Bondar is running to represent Texas Congressional District 32 and positions himself as a local, non-insider option, noting that he lives in the district and can vote for himself.
The district recently shifted under new lines, combining fast-growing suburban areas with long-established rural communities across North and East Texas.
The campaign’s core communications insight is that mass media builds awareness, but texting builds familiarity. Bondar for Congress is using each channel for what it does best.
In Texas CD32, voters see and hear same-cycle messaging everywhere: billboards, streaming, social and inboxes. The problem is not message access. The problem is message sameness.
The Bondar team saw a specific risk with texting: if a message leans too hard on national politics and generic issue framing, the candidate’s name disappears into the noise.
With the district expanding across multiple counties and communities, voters do not just need issue alignment. They want reassurance that the person asking for their vote understands the district firsthand.
Bondar for Congress did not use texting as a “cheaper billboard.”
The campaign treated texting as the most intimate voter-contact channel available at scale: a direct message that lands in the same place voters talk to their family and friends. That creates a high bar for tone. If the message does not feel human, it fails fast.
Lane 1: Mass media for positioning
Lane 2: Texting for relationship
Many campaigns blast one message to every number they have.
Bondar for Congress segmented the master universe into smaller, specific groups so each text could sound relevant and earned. The campaign team highlighted list breakdowns, such as “Rockwall Individual Voters” and interest-driven sends rather than “send to everyone.”
This was not segmentation for the sake of segmentation. It was segmentation to protect tone.
Bondar for Congress built a repeatable playbook that other campaigns can cop
The team saw a consistent funnel:
Two examples became the clearest proof points:
The Rockwall fishing message
The Christmas family video
This is the “neighbor” advantage in one moment: voters do not ask follow-up questions when your text reads like a mail piece.
The campaign did not just send standalone messages. The team watched how contacts moved through a sequence: early mass positioning, then more personal content, then issue testing.
That thread-based view helped them spot who stayed quiet and who eventually replied once the content felt human.
The team considered an issue-based message as a quick pulse check, then debated whether to send it broadly, since divisive content can flip an engaged contact in an instant.
Instead, they discussed pulling highly interactive voters into a separate list so future outreach could stay personal, consistent and trust-building.
This is advanced campaign texting: you stop treating every voter as the same kind of audience once they raise their hand.
Bondar for Congress used replies to do real organizing work: tagging voters as “strong support,” “lean support,” “undecided persuasion,” “strong opposed,” capturing emails and planning follow-up.
That turns texting into more than voter contact. It becomes list refinement, supporter identification and volunteer and donor prep in the same motion.
“Neighbor texting” only works if you have neighbor content.
Bondar for Congress built a deep bench of material that supports personal outreach:
The campaign also highlighted the value of video assets sized correctly for texting, including a 30-second spot that can live in a message thread.
Bondar for Congress measured success the way serious texting programs should: not just volume, but the quality of responses and what they unlocked.
What changed when the campaign texted “like a neighbor”
Scale
What other campaigns should steal from this playbook
Bondar for Congress proves a point that many campaigns miss: you do not win trust by sounding like every other candidate. You win it by showing up like someone who lives there.
Billboards and streaming ads can tell voters who you are. P2P texting can make voters feel like they know you. Bondar for Congress built that familiarity by aggressively segmenting, sending personal MMS and video content and treating replies as the start of a relationship rather than a distraction.
If you want to build a texting program that sounds like a neighbor and scales like a serious campaign operation, RumbleUp gives you the infrastructure to segment cleanly, handle high-volume two-way conversations and keep message quality consistent.